0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Å°æ°è ÁßȯÀڽǿ¡¼­ÀÇ DNR (Do Not Resuscitation) °áÁ¤ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ÀÇ °£È£ È°µ¿ ½ÇÅÂ

The Status of Nursing Activities from DNR (Do Not Resuscitation) Decision Process In Neurological Intensive Care Unit

±Û·Î¹ú °Ç°­°ú °£È£ 2011³â 1±Ç 2È£ p.73 ~ 82
KMID : 1033320110010020073
±è¸íÈñ ( Kim Myung-Hee ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

°­ÀºÈñ ( Kang Eun-Hee ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was attempted to investigate the status of nursing activities in neurological intensive care unit according to DNR decision types.

Methods: medical records about nursing activities of 30 nurses according to DNR decision-making process of 26 DNR subjects In D university hospital neurological intensive care unit in Busan from August 1, 2008 to July31, 2009,

Results: 4 types of progress were classified until a consent of DNR was written: family requested to discontinue treatment without discussion with their doctor; patients condition was suddenly worsened; although discussed about DNR, they did not agree with the range of treatment; DNR agreement was made at admission. In this process, we found that nurses reported patient`s condition and delivered family`s hope to doctor, proposed to agree with DNR, provided information about patient`s condition and education to family, and advocated family`s position.

Conclusion: We found that nurses performed the role of communicator, proponent, educator, and advocator until doctor and family wrote a consent of DNR.
KeyWords
½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú, ±ÝÁö, °áÁ¤À¯Çü, °£È£, È°µ¿, ½ÇÅÂ
Resuscitation orders, Decision making, Nurses
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)